Michael Herwald
Script vs Film
Reservoir Dogs, directed by Quentin
Tarantino is about an armed robbery gone wrong. I would consider this one of
Tarantino’s better movies, and an instant classic in my book. I first saw the
movie when I was in 7th grade, and other than the violence I did not
find it very entertaining, but when tasked with the assignment to re-watch the
movie and compare it to its screenplay, I fell in love. What Tarantino is able
to accomplish on the screen is truly unique and it makes him one of the most
acclaimed writers/directors of our time. With that being said I first want to
analyze the movie before it is in film, so I will take a look at the screenplay
for Reservoir Dogs.
One
necessary part, perhaps the most important one, for achieving cinematic gold is
to have a well though out and decisive screenplay. A screenplay is not like
anything I have read before it is too dialogue based for a book and too bland
with character description to be a play. When comparing a screenplay to a film
I notice to key difference, one is in emotion and the other is visual
appearance.
Everyone
has at least heard of the Twilight movies,
and how one of the biggest complaints is that Kristin Stewart (the lead female)
lacks emotion while she acts, unfortunately this leads to a crappy movie and horrible
Internet memes. A screenplay does not convey any emotion directly like a film
does that is mostly the job of the actors portraying the characters within the
screenplay. How come some movies, with talented actors, are better than other
movies, with talented actors? The reason is directly correlated with how well
the screenplay is written and developed. An actors job is to read the script,
but if the script is poorly written then there is not much even a good actor
can do, in fact with a bad scripts the acting can seem phony and not sincere.
The
biggest difference between a screenplay and a film is one does not see what is
happening in front of them while reading. Especially with Reservoir Dogs there is a lack of character description within the
screenplay, which can be good because one does not want that to get in the way
of the story. This is part of the reason Tarantino is so good because he writes
and directs his own movies, so he already has an idea of what he wants his
characters to look like and who his actors will be.
What
I have learned is a screenplay is not supposed to be this amazing work of art,
it is supposed to be the anchor to a story. A screenplay is the steppingstone
for the movie, and one cannot coexist without each other. It is the foundation
to a work of art.
As
a side note I find it very interesting the varying levels of change between
movies from screenplay to film. I
would most likely note that as director’s discretion, for example if he sees something
that needs changing while filming there is no need to change the screenplay.